There has been some debate in the last couple of weeks about
the way in which authors earn a living. This was kicked off by the Cambridge
Professor who objected to a famous author refusing to write an introduction to
his academic book for free.
All over the internet people are saying that they should be
able to download books for free, because ‘art should be free to all’.
Another author friend took to Facebook to decry the fact that
the English teacher at a school which was about to attend had sent him a ‘very
snippy’ email deploring the fact that he was expecting to sell copies of his
own books after his event.
Still more authors have raised their voices about school
visits where they have been refused the chance to sell books, have had invoices
go unpaid (or unpaid for months at a time), have done two days of a three day
event, only to be told on the morning of day three that the school wasn’t happy
with their presentation as it did not fit in with the syllabus and that they
would therefore not be paying them the full price, or have simply encountered children who were
not warned in advance that they would need to bring money on the day of the
author visit (who hasn’t had that one?).
Are these authors being unreasonable? Greedy?
Mercenary even?
Time for the Edge to weigh-in.
It is a well known fact that jobs which offer the highest
‘job satisfaction’ are also the lowest paid: teachers, nurses, social workers,
firemen, policeman, jobs in publishing, in the creative arts, roles working for
charities … the list goes on. Jobs that
feed the soul, that make you
feel as if you are contributing to society, that make you happy to go to work,
these are the jobs that offer the least in the way of material compensation, as
if job satisfaction is enough for people to live on.
The fact is that job satisfaction is valued and employers in
these industries can offer low salaries, simply because if someone walks out,
there will be a hundred more, desperate to take their place.
And in the publishing industry it is the authors (excluding the
A-list: King, Rowling etc.) who are the least well paid. I earn much
less per year than the person who empties the bins at my publishing
house. Yes, I love what I do. Yes, I would do it regardless of whether or
not I was published (and therefore paid), because the muse is a demanding
mistress. And yet … how many
world-changing novels are not being written because frankly one cannot live on
job satisfaction alone and aspiring authors must also have day jobs to put food
on the table?
Shouldn’t we, as a culture value art enough to pay the
artist? All those people demanding their
free downloads will be pretty hacked off when the quality deteriorates (because
publishers can no longer pay for editors and authors no longer spend time doing
rewrites). When eventually the artists
give up altogether and get jobs in the financial sector then they might come up
with the revolutionary idea, of perhaps, paying artists to create art.
We’ve all heard of insanely high advances for book deals and
yes, we all hope that our next book will go out at auction for a decent sum, in
the same way that struggling actors hope to be cast as the lead in the next Hollywood blockbuster.
But the fact is most of us have four-figure advances, some even
lower. Royalties earn us literally
pennies per book (and only once you pay off your advance – it is called an
advance for a reason: we have to pay it
back using our first royalty cheques).
The fact is that most of us cannot earn a living from the
money that our publisher pays us for our years of work. So we subsidise this through events, school
visits, creative writing workshops, festivals and so on. Schools love to have authors in. It is brilliant for the students to listen to
someone talk enthusiastically about reading and writing. Author visits are generally greatly
valued. The Society of Authors suggests
that we should be asking for £250-£350 for a full day or £150 for a talk
lasting no longer than an hour. Plus
expenses.
Yet many authors are reluctant to charge the full whack for
school visits. In the main we are a
self-effacing breed. The years of
rejection before eventual publication is perhaps the reason that we are
backwards about coming forwards. We are
surprised when we are told ‘well done’ and are therefore poor at valuing what
we do properly.
So many venues expect authors to work for free - for the
publicity and the job satisfaction. Hay
pays in wine, many other festivals not at all, some even expect us to buy our
own tickets. Some schools object to us
asking for money, or selling our books.
They don’t realise that the amount we earn from their school visit may
be the only income we are getting in that whole month. They don’t realise that only if we sell lots
of books will our publisher commission another one from us and that each school
visit contributes to the possibility of us getting another book deal. But not if the students are not warned that
they will be able to buy a book that day.
What is the solution?
Perhaps some kind of communist contract that all authors should be paid
the same advance, the same amount for school visits, festivals events and so on?
It won’t happen, art is so subjective. But can we at least agree that authors do a
great job? That authors have a talent
that is unusual: vast imaginations combined with wordsmithery and the determination
and perseverance to get all of our words onto paper. We slave nights to meet deadlines, give up
weekends with our families to deliver our story to the reader, give up our days to visit schools in order to inspire
the young. And that we are not therefore
unreasonable, greedy or mercenary when we ask for the chance to sell our books.