It appears to have become
fashionable recently to write blogs and articles, to make comments on Twitter
and Facebook and to journalists which make fun of Young Adult literature.
These detractors, some of whom are
writers themselves, tend to focus their derision by stereotyping the genre as
nothing but Twilight clones, Hunger Games wannabes and sparkly pink books about love at
first sight.
Demanding more protagonists who
don’t solve their problems by kicking ass, learning karate or becoming more
attractive suggests to your audience that most of them do. Demanding fewer
books about sparkly vampires or handsome werewolves implies that this is the
dominating feature of YA literature (Twilight was written ten years ago, get
over it). Saying that your own book stands out because it is complex implies
that other YA is not. Asking for the elimination of ‘instalove’ allows your
reader to infer that no YA literature contains relationships with slow build or
real depth.
How are writers of YA literature
meant to bring in more readers (even to convert reluctant readers) when there
are people, other writers no less, telling them not to bother reading within
the genre aimed at them.
At the moment YA is the nerdy kid
in the playground; the one it’s easy, even fashionable to pick on.
Perhaps this is something to do
with its success. YA literature is one of the few genres that has shown market
growth throughout this depressed economy, and, as we know, bullies don’t like a
successful underdog.
Perhaps it is because the books
that have been massively successful have not all had great literary merit (but
have been cracking good stories nevertheless – and given a choice between
reading literary fiction with no story and a book with an amazing story, but
which won’t have passages read out in poetry appreciation I know which I’d pick).
Perhaps it is because the books that Hollywood chooses to make into film are
the best known, if not the best examples of the genre, enabling those who don’t
read YA widely to pigeonhole all YA literature (although by this argument I
could go on to judge all adult literature by Fifty Shades of Grey).
Perhaps it is because the YA
community is well known to be ‘nice’. As writers, readers and bloggers were are
generally accepted to be mutually supportive and friendly, does this make our
genre an ‘easy target’?
Perhaps it is because our readers
themselves are, or appear to be easy targets. It has always been the role of
those past a certain age to criticise the choices of the young – their music,
their clothes and, now that they have it, their literature.
Readers of YA literature are not
easy targets, as some attackers of YA literature have recently discovered but …
and here’s the big but, some of them are.
Many readers of YA are young. Not
all of them of course, YA welcomes readers of all ages, but by definition,
Young Adult literature is aimed at young people.
When someone attacks YA as a
genre, minimalises its importance, says that it has no literary merit, no
complexity, no depth, no understanding of the world, especially if they have
their own platform, I wonder if they realise that they are also saying to its loyal, young readers: there’s something wrong with you. Your choices show that you aren’t clever enough to be reading
books that deal with real issues, or that have true complexity, you aren’t
serious enough to enjoy real literature. All you’re good enough for is fiddling
around in the shallow end of the pool, if you had any real chops, you’d join us
in the deep end – the adult section.
The YA literature that I have
experienced most commonly deals with subjects that concern young people. It
helps them to work through and understand issues such as poverty, bullying,
relationships, sexuality, climate change, death of loved ones, war, politics,
violence, hatred, bigotry, racism, working out who you are, where you fit into
the world, who you are going to be in the future and yes, love. It teachers its
readership that it can be brave, that it can bring about change in the world –
and who more important to send this message out to than the young?
Yes, some YA could perhaps be
described ‘fast food literature’ (and why not – who’d want to read Tolstoy,
Shakespeare and Melville all the time) but not all of it not, in fact, the majority. I’m not going to provide a
reading list here (although I could); instead I suggest that we start a hashtag
of the things that YA does well:
- Engaging teenagers in debate
- Enabling conversations between teenagers and their
guardians
- Letting teenagers know that they are not the only
ones in the world with those concerns, those problems, those feelings
- Exploring the ideas of and the ethics behind
scientific discoveries
- Engaging reluctant readers by providing books that
are totally gripping
- Creating believable, memorable characters
- Creating whole worlds for readers to get lost in
- Using science fiction, fantasy and magical realism
to deal with serious issues
- Widening teen vocabulary, emotional intelligence
and articulation
- Preparing readers for adult literature …
